race to forget, Boullier said. For Formula One as a sport, its a race

COLUMBIA, Mo. -- Missouri athletic officials announce updated plans Friday for a two-year, $100 million renovation project of Memorial Stadiums south end zone facilities.The kids that we are recruiting are probably going to go take a visit at another conference school, and you never want to be in a position where you dont have an opportunity to recruit a kid because of something like a facility, athletic director Jim Sterk Odom said. Obviously, this is going to give our student athletes the best chance to be successful.Missouri has struggled the past two seasons, winning just two Southeastern Conference games after winning back-to-back division championships in 2013 and 2014. In spite of this, Sterk is optimistic about fundraising efforts.The support weve had so far has been outstanding, Sterk said. Its very encouraging, but we are still working hard. We have had some promising conversations with potential contributors, and we hope to continue making those exciting gift announcements going forward.In recent months, Missouri has received six private donations in the seven-figure range, three of which came anonymously.Initial plans allocated $75 million to restore and update the existing structure in the south end zone. However, Sterk indicated Friday that the project estimate is now nearing the $100 million mark, and that architectural consultants have advised the department to demolish the current structure to make way for a new one.Sterk said that donors close to the project were also largely in favor of an entirely new facility.Football coach Barry Odom stressed the significance of such a project in regards to the programs level of commitment to its student athletes.Its exciting for them to see, Odom said. They know the product theyre going to get with the coaching side of it, with the academic side of it, and now, enhancing and always knowing that were pushing to give them the best, thats a huge advantage for our program.Among the updates discussed were additional premium seating, team offices, equipment and training facilities, and multiple private club areas for designated ticket holders.Sterk said finalized budget plans will be presented to the schools Board of Curators in February for final approval.Many details are still unclear, including the architect and the project manager, maximum seating capacity after completion, and a firm deadline for completion, though Sterk said a tentative goal is prior to the start of the 2019 season.---More AP college football: www.collegefootball.ap.org and https://twitter.com/AP-Top25 Fake Baseball Jerseys .J. -- Marshawn Lynch said Thursday it will be good to get back to football after the Seattle quiet talking running back wrapped up his final mandatory media session of Super Bowl week. Fake NFL Jerseys . MLS Commissioner Don Garber and Miami-Dade County Mayor Carlos Gimenez also will attend the session, which was announced Monday. The league has discussed placing its next two expansion teams in Miami and Atlanta. https://www.fakejerseys.us.com/ . The Cleveland Indians, Tampa Bay Rays, and Texas Rangers all won on Sunday meaning the Rangers will host the Rays in a play-in game on Monday. China Jerseys . Cote was eligible to become a free agent Feb. 15. Cote helped running back Jon Cornish run for a league-high 1,813 rushing yards en route to being named the leagues most outstanding player. Fake Football Jerseys . They reached the 100-point plateau for the fourth time in five games, bested the visiting Trail Blazers by 34 in the paint and scored 19 of the final 25 points in regulation. The Supreme Court of India has said there is, on first impression, a charge of perjury that can be laid against BCCI president Anurag Thakur and the boards general manager of game development Ratnakar Shetty for lying under oath.The court also reserved its order on the Lodha Committees suggestion to remove ineligible BCCI office bearers and appoint former civil servant GK Pillai as an observer to oversee business operations of the board. After the BCCI rejected Pillai during Thursdays hearing, the court asked the board to submit, by December 23, the names of three people who could replace the existing office bearers and govern the BCCI.The court suggested former India allrounder Mohinder Amarnath as one of the names. It is expected to hear the matter again after the winter vacation, which ends on January 2.The issue of perjury arose because Thakur, in an affidavit, had denied that he sought a letter from the ICC stating that the Lodha Committees recommendation to have a member of the Comptroller and Auditor Generals office on the apex council of the BCCI amounted to government interference in the board. Thakurs request had been revealed by ICC chief executive David Richardson in an interview to an Indian TV channel.Thakur had said he only asked ICC chairman Shashank Manohar what his stance on the matter had been when he was the BCCI president. I pointed out to the Chairman of the ICC, Mr Shashank Manohar that, when he was President of BCCI, he had taken a view that the recommendations of the Justice Lodha committee appointing the nominee of the CAG on the Apex Council would amount to governmental interference, and might invoke an action of suspension from ICC, Thakur had said in his affidavit. I therefore requested him that, being the ICC Chairman, can a letter be issued clarifying the position which he had taken as BCCI President.Shetty, in an affidavit on October 7, had denied that Thakur had sought ICC intervention at all. Observing there was a variance between Thakur and Shettys submissions, the court said: Mr Shetty in his response to the status report claims that the CEO of ICC had falsely stated in his interview that the President of BCCI had requested ICC to issue a letter stating that the intervention of this Court amounted to governmental interference. The version of Mr Shetty is at variance to what is alleged to have been stated by the CEO of ICC.On Thursday, the court said there appeared to be evidence against Thakur and Shetty of lying under oath and asked the BCCI to submit relevant documents to avoid perjury. Prima facie it seems that Anurag Thakur has perjured and lied under oath because of the letter to Manohar. It is a case of prosecution, Chief Justice of India TS Thakur said during the hearing. You had no occasion to approach Manohar. Where was the occasion to raise the issue once we had proonounced on this.ddddddddddddThis amounts to perjury.The court asked Kapil Sibal, the lawyer representing the BCCI president, to apologise if Thakur wanted to escape an adverse order against him. Sibal explained to the court that his clients question to Manohar was not against court intervention but whether appointment of the CAG official on the Apex Council would amount to government interference.According to Lodha Committee secretary Gopal Sankaranaryanan, there was a discrepancy in the affidavit submitted by Thakur and the letter submitted by Manohar. In [Anurag] Thakurs version of events it is a clarification he had sought. In Manohars version of events, he said as ICC chairman I was asked to give a letter, not a clarification, saying that this amounts to interference. For me this amounts to variance.The Amicus Curiae Gopal Subramnium had in earlier hearings told the court that Thakur was playing an obstructionist role and impeding the implementation of the Lodha Committees recommendations. The whole issue is that of there is a person [Anurag Thakur] obstructing and in contempt of court. Then should he head the BCCI? Chief Justice Thakur said on Thursday. We have given opportunities and time. Dont do something unpleasant.Sibal reiterated the BCCIs point that it could not force the state associations to accept the Lodha recommendations, and that a majority vote was needed to pass them. At several board meetings, the states had voiced opposition to most of the Lodha Committees recommendations: in particular, the one-state-one-vote policy, the age cap for office bearers, and the limits on tenure.The court replied by saying that one option was to supercede the office bearers, as suggested by the Lodha Committee. You supercede them, the court said. Who should be appointed in your place, give us recommendation in next one week.The Lodha Committee - comprising former Chief Justice of India RM Lodha and retired Supreme Court judges Ashok Bhan and R Raveendran - was formed in January 2015 to determine appropriate punishments for some of the officials involved in the 2013 IPL corruption scandal, and also to propose changes to streamline the BCCI, reform its functioning, prevent sporting fraud and conflict of interest.In January 2016, the committee released its report, which recommended an exhaustive overhaul of the BCCIs governance and administrative structures. On July 18, the Supreme Court approved the majority of the recommendations and directed the Lodha Committee to supervise the BCCIs implementations of the same. However, despite the Lodha Committee laying out timelines and other directives, the board has not cooperated because its state associations objected to the recommendations. ' ' '