Dein erstes Forum » scoring only 139 runs in seven innings.

The New Orleans Saints wore 1960s throwback uniforms last Sunday -- part of their year-long celebration of the teams 50th season. They were the eighth NFL team to wear throwbacks this season, following the Bears, Dolphins, Bills, Rams, Steelers, Packers and Washington (plus the Falcons wore a hybrid design that included throwback elements).This years throwbacks -- like all NFL throwbacks that have been worn since 2013 -- have had one thing in common: The teams used their existing helmet shells and either swapped out or removed their usual helmet logos, striping tape and face masks. Thats due to the NFLs one-shell rule, which aims to decrease the risk of concussions by preventing teams from switching to new sets of helmets in the middle of the season. So teams can still wear throwbacks if they use their existing shells, but throwbacks that would require a different-colored helmet -- like New Englands Pat Patriot design or Tampa Bays Creamsicle set -- are now off-limits. (For more information on the thinking behind the one-shell rule, and answers to many questions about it, look here.)The one-shell rule now has been with us for four seasons, and its become a truism among many fans that the rule has ruined the NFLs throwback scene. But is that really accurate? Its true that a few beloved fan favorites like Pat Patriot and the Creamsicles have essentially been kicked to the curb. But some of the other throwbacks that are now verboten were never that great to begin with. In many cases, mothballing them has been a case of addition by subtraction.To further that point, lets look at all the past NFL throwbacks that have been affected by the one-shell rule -- by your friendly uniform columnists count, there are 16 such designs -- and see if were really worse off without them. We wont be looking at every conceivable throwback that could be worn -- only the ones that already have been worn as throwbacks but are now off-limits due to the rule. For example, lets consider the Jets: The rule prevents them from wearing their old 1980s and 90s uniforms because theyd need a new set of green helmets, but we wont include that on our list because theyve never worn that design as a throwback. But we will include their Titans of New York throwback on our list, because theyve worn it as a throwback in the past but cant do so now.Got all that? Here we go, one off-limits throwback at a time, listed alphabetically by team name:1. Broncos: Early 60s designOriginally worn: 1960-61Worn as a throwback: 2009Great loss for humankind? Uh, no. Although theres something amusing about grown football players wearing vertically striped socks, its safe to say that nobodys mourning the loss of this throwback, least of all Broncos fans. Good riddance.2. Broncos: Mid-60s designOriginally worn: 1965-66Worn as a throwback: 1994Great loss for humankind? Yup. Although the bucking bronco helmet logo is a bit cheesy, this is an underrated uniform that deserves to be revived. Too bad the one-shell rule prevents that.3. Broncos: Orange Crush designOriginally worn: 1968-1996Worn as a throwback: 2001Great loss for humankind? Definitely. For many fans, this is still the uniform they think of when they think of the Broncos, and it would be great to see it on the field again. Although the helmet is a lighter shade of blue than Denvers current navy shell, the team wore a reasonable facsimile of the old look for this seasons Color Rush game by using the throwback logo and striping on the current shell. Would that be close enough for a throwback uniform, or would fans complain that the helmet color wasnt right? Only one way to find out: Try it.4. Buccaneers: Creamsicle designOriginally worn: 1976-96Worn as a throwback: 2009-12Great loss for humankind? Yes. Ridiculed for years before emerging as a nostalgia-driven favorite, the Bucs original uniform set, complete with Bucco Bruce on the helmet, has become the poster child for the one-shell rules collateral damage on the throwback scene. Its a big part of the teams heritage -- and, arguably, the NFLs heritage -- and its a shame it cant be worn anymore. Free Bucco Bruce!5. Colts: Mid-50s designOriginally worn: 1954-55Worn as a throwback: 2010Great loss for humankind? Nah. Putting the horseshoes on the back of the helmet, instead of the sides, is interesting (the idea being thats what you see when a colt -- or a Colt -- is galloping away from you), but its more of a novelty than a good design. And if the Colts really want to wear something like this, they could do a throwback to 1956, when they wore the same helmet concept on a white shell.6. Cowboys: Early 60s designOriginally worn: 1960-63Worn as a throwback: 2004-12Great loss for humankind? Maybe not a great loss, but still a loss. The Cowboys white-helmeted throwbacks had become a Thanksgiving tradition thats now been shelved. Too bad.7. Eagles: Kelly Green designOriginally worn: 1954-64, 1985-95Worn as a throwback: 2010Great loss for humankind? For sure. The only thing that would be better than reviving this design as a throwback would be reviving it as the teams primary look.8. Eagles: City flag designOriginally worn: 1934Worn as a throwback: 2007Great loss for humankind? Nope. This uniform was good as a history lesson (its colors are based on the design of the Philadelphia city flag, which in turn was based on the Swedish national flag, because of the original Swedish colonization of the Philly region) but not as an Eagles uniform. Fans hated it, and theres no chance itll be worn again, rule or no rule.9. Falcons: Original designOriginally worn: 1966-1969Worn as a throwback: 2009-11Great loss for humankind? A little bit, yeah. Atlantas original helmet design had a red shell, to honor the University of Georgia, and gold striping, to honor Georgia Tech -- a nice dual shout-out to Atlantas two college football teams. Symbolism aside, its also a very solid look -- one that would be nice to see again.10. Jets: Titans of New York designOriginally worn: 1960-62Worn as a throwback: 2007-09, 2011Great loss for humankind? Nope. True, the Jets franchise was known as the Titans for the first three years of its existence, but thats more of a historical footnote, or maybe the answer to a trivia question, than a key chapter in the teams history. Fans never warmed up to this throwback design, and the team is better off without it.11. Packers: Acme Packers design with brown helmetOriginally worn: 1929-30Worn as a throwback: 2010-11Great loss for humankind? Nope. The Packers original Acme Packers uniform, worn back during the Great Depression, featured brown leather helmets, so the team opted for brown shells when reviving that design as a throwback in 2010. But the brown lids never looked right, so it was actually an improvement when the one-shell rule forced the team to switch to its regular yellow shells with the decals removed in 2013. Theres a lesson there: Sometimes being less historically accurate can be more aesthetically pleasing.12. Patriots: Pat Patriot designOriginally worn: 1961-92Worn as a throwback: 1994, 2002, 2009-12Great loss for humankind? Yes, yes, a thousand times yes. Fans can debate whether the Pats original Minuteman mascot character, Pat Patriot, is better than the teams current Flying Elvis logo (some prefer Pat and wish hed never gone away, while others prefer Elvis because he symbolizes the success of the Brady/Bellichick era), but just about everyone agrees that Pat should get to come out and play at least once a year. This is probably the single biggest casualty of the one-shell rule.13. Steelers: 1962 designOriginally worn: 1962Worn as a throwback: 2009-10Great loss for humankind? Maybe not a great loss, but a loss all the same. Its a nice change of pace to see that familiar Steelers logo against the yellow helmet, and the rest of the uniform is very solid.14. Titans: Oilers designOriginally worn: 1960-65Worn as a throwback: 1994, 2009Great loss for humankind? Yes, but with an asterisk. Its been great when the Titans have honored their franchises Oilers root, but they can still do that by throwing back to the Oilers white-helmeted era -- which was actually the teams strongest look. Luv ya, blue!15. Washington: Lombardi-era designOriginally worn: 1970-71Worn as a throwback: 2007Great loss for humankind? Its complicated. Anything involving Washingtons branding is a loaded proposition due to the teams use of Native American iconography. But with that caveat in mind, this design, which they wore when coach Vince Lombardi moved from Green Bay to Washington and gave the team a somwehat Packers-esque makeover, is one of the better looks from the teams visual history.16. Washington: Leatherhead helmetOriginally worn: 1937Worn as a throwback: 2012A great loss for humankind? From a helmet perspective, yes. Washingtons modern interpretation of the old leatherhead helmet had the illusion of a textured surface -- a really neat effect, and much better than the plain brown shell that the Packers used for their own leatherhead simulation (see above). Once the one-shell rule went into effect, Washington kept wearing this throwback uniform with their current helmet shells -- not bad, but its a shame that they cant go with the leatherhead treatment (and that nobody else can go that route either).If you tally up the assessments, you get 11 cases of Too bad we cant see that again! versus five of Eh, no biggie. So yes, the one-shell rule does appear to have been a net negative from an aesthetic standpoint. Moreover, there are potentially great throwbacks that have never been worn and currently cant be worn due to the rule, such as the Seahawks original design, the Chargers Air Coryell design and the Jets New York Sack Exchange design. The rule also prevents the Thursday-night Color Rush uniforms from reaching their full potential, because the helmets often dont match the rest of the uniforms. (You can decide for yourself if inhibiting the scope of the Color Rush program is a good or bad thing.)Will the one-shell rule stay in place forever? Probably not. It seems likely that some sort of workaround, such as full-shell vinyl wraps, will eventually be developed. And with college teams continuing to routinely wear multiple shells each season with no apparent ill effects, maybe the NFL will simply drop or modify the rule. Until then, though, well have to live without Pat Patriot and Bucco Bruce -- which will just make their eventual return, if and when it happens, that much sweeter.Paul Lukas wishes the NFL had gone with Throwback Thursdays, instead of the Color Rush program, for Thursday-night games. If you like this column, youll probably like his Uni Watch Blog, plus you can follow him on Twitter and Facebook. Want to learn about his Uni Watch Membership Program, be added to his mailing list so youll always know when a new column has been posted or just ask him a question? Contact him here. Discount Nike Shoes Australia . The injury bothered Bledsoe in the Suns victory over the Clippers on Monday and he sat out the teams home loss to Memphis on Thursday night. Cheap Nike Shoes Australia Free Shipping . Uniteds eighth defeat of a wretched campaign means Liverpool, which currently occupies the fourth and final Champions League place, could go nine points clear of its fierce rival by beating West Bromwich Albion on Sunday. Charlie Adam scored both of Stokes goals at Britannia Stadium either side of Robin van Persies equalizer, with a miserable day for seventh-place United capped by first-half injuries to centre halves Jonny Evans and Phil Jones that forced them off. http://www.cheapshoesaustralianike.com/ . Ivanovic was leading 7-5, 1-0 when Hantuchova withdrew after falling 0-40 behind in the second game. The match started slowly for Ivanovic, who surrendered her first two serves as Hantuchova took a 5-3 lead. Discount Nike Shoes Online Australia . It just didnt show when he hit the ice. Berra made 42 saves and Kris Russell scored at 1:32 of overtime, lifting the Calgary Flames to a 3-2 victory over the Chicago Blackhawks on Sunday night. Cheap Nike Shoes Australia Online . Louis Blues teammates who would also be participating in the Olympics, Alex Pietrangelo felt right at home, no different in some ways to the travel experience of any old road trip – save for the length of the journey, that is. WICB president Dave Cameron has said Darren Bravo was offered a Grade-C contract because his poor recent performances did not merit a higher pay grade. Cameron also revealed that of the 15 players who were recently offered WICB contracts till September 2017, only Kraigg Brathwaite and Marlon Samuels had received contracts higher than the C category. Along with Bravo, Carlos Brathwaite and Samuels, who was given a Grade-B contract, had declined the boards offer.This is the first time that the WICB offered an explanation of the contract Bravo was offered. It is explicit that if your averages are not above a certain level it tells you what contracts you get. It is very, very explicit, Cameron told SportsMax TV, a Caribbean television network. His averages in the last two years have been declining, so what do you do? Reward poor performance or do you encourage him to get better?Bravo is one of the most experienced players in the West Indies Test squad and when Cameron asked if it was demotivating for the batsman to be offered a low contract, he said: If you continue to keep giving him an A contract then what is the motivation to get better? He has been on an A contract and he hasnt done well.Bravo responded with a tweet saying he had never been offered a Grade-A contract. You hav been failing 4 d last 4yrs. Y dont u resign and FYI Ive neva been given an A contract. Big idiot @davec51, he said on Twitter.Bravo, 27, was West Indies second-highestt run getter in the recently concluded Test series against Pakistan in the UAE.ddddddddddddBefore that, he had a poor Test series against India at home, scoring only 139 runs in seven innings. Since November 2014, Bravo scored 1089 runs in 17 Tests for West Indies, a tally that is second to Kraigg Brathwaites 1258 runs in 20 matches. Bravo scored two centuries and seven fifties in this period, and was also the second-highest run getter for the side in away Tests in this period, with 391 runs at an average of 43.44. Bravos overall batting average in overseas Tests is 51.18.The WICB retainers comprise five categories - A+, A, B+, B and C - and the eventual grades are based on a points system used for players. These points are calculated by an appraisal formula that compares the players performance over the last 12 months to his overall career figures. In 2015, Bravo scored 644 runs in nine Tests at an average of 35.77, with his best performances coming overseas. In Sri Lanka, he scored two half-centuries from four innings before racking up 247 runs in five innings at 49.4 in Australia. In, Bravo aggregated 300 runs in five matches at an average of 37.50.Cameron did not provide the specifics of how many points Bravo had scored. Every single player got C contract except Kraigg Brathwaite and Marlon Samuels, he said. ' ' '