This story appears in ESPN The Magazines October 3 Cubs Issue. Subscribe today!IN 2011, A FEW hundred people at a Swedish computer festival saw the first League of Legends World Championship. Now its the event in esports, selling out Staples Center in 45 minutes. On Sept. 29, 16 teams from four continents begin a monthlong quest for the Summoners Cup. First step, the group stage: Four teams enter, two leave -- like the World Cup, but with fingers instead of feet. Heres what to expect.Group A This group contains the tournaments top-ranked team, the ROX Tigers. But some European upstarts, North American mainstays and unpredictable Russians look to make life difficult.ROX TIGERS?- SOUTH KOREA POWER RANKING:?1 Korean teams have won the past three worlds, and ROX is the favorite to be the fourth straight and shed its reputation as perpetual runner-up to compatriot SKT.G2 ESPORTS - EUROPE POWER RANKING: 6 This team dominated Europe in its first year in the top division, but inexperience might prove its undoing. Still, this is as favorable a draw as it could hope for.COUNTER LOGIC GAMING - NORTH AMERICA POWER RANKING: 12 CLG has been erratic all summer but has a history of pulling off dramatic upsets when expectations are low. ROX and G2 would be foolish to count this team out.ALBUS NOX LUNA - RUSSIA POWER RANKING: 16 This wild-card team likes to lure its opponents into a false sense of security before turning the tables with unconventional strategies. Doubtful it can surprise ROX, though.Group B Group B is in some ways the most intriguing. It features the defending world champions, the team that knows how to beat them and the team thats peaking at just the right time.SK TELECOM T1 - SOUTH KOREA POWER RANKING: 3 Reigning world champion SKT has had a poor season by its own lofty standards but should easily boss this group to make it to the quarterfinals.FLASH WOLVES?- TAIWAN? POWER RANKING: 7 This dark horse is the only team in the world that plays better against South Korean foes, having beaten SKT and ROX in the past year. Its key test: a surging Cloud9.CLOUD9?- NORTH AMERICA POWER RANKING: 9 Cloud9 might be a 3-seed, but it sure isnt playing like it. Led by Jeong Impact Eon-young, one of the fields most in-form players, its hot streak might get hotter.I MAY?- CHINA POWER RANKING: 11 I May wasnt supposed to be here. Five months ago, the team was in the amateur division. Now its at worlds. How far can this Cinderella go? Probably fourth.Group C EDward Gaming is a virtual lock to advance, but the second spot is up for grabs. The remaining three teams are equally matched -- consider this the Group of Life.EDWARD GAMING?- CHINA POWER RANKING: 2 The reigning Chinese champion went undefeated in the summer season and boasts three of the best individual players in the tournament. A top-four finish is in the cards.H2K GAMING?- EUROPE POWER RANKING: 10 H2K, a squad that loves nothing better than a good fight, could become the sensation of the tournament, provided it takes AHQ seriously in the group phase.AHQ E-SPORTS CLUB?- TAIWAN POWER RANKING: 14 Its three straight worlds for AHQ, another team that likes to charge into fights no matter the odds. Expect sparks to fly when it takes on H2K.INTZ E-SPORTS?- BRAZIL POWER RANKING: 15 INTZ was one of the best teams that never made it. Until now. Its strength lies in its unity: The players have been together a whopping two years, a lifetime in esports.Group D Welcome to the Group of Death. Team SoloMid, Samsung Galaxy and Royal Never Give Up all aspire to deep runs into the knockout stage, but at least one will see its dream get pentakilled.TEAM SOLOMID?- NORTH AMERICA POWER RANKING: 4 TSM is the best North American team ever to enter worlds; OK, so two players are Danish. Well take em! Anything less than a top-four finish would be a disappointment.SAMSUNG GALAXY?- SOUTH KOREA POWER RANKING: 5 After winning the 2014 title, Samsungs players left for the wealthier Chinese league. This rebuilt team lacks star power, but a run at the cup isnt out of the question.ROYAL NEVER GIVE UP?- CHINA POWER RANKING: 8 Royal Never Give Up, a finalist in 2013 and 2014, looks strong on paper, but its star-studded lineup has failed to jell in recent months.SPLYCE?- EUROPE POWER RANKING: 13 Splyce has gone from fighting for survival to worlds in just five months. The roster lacks experience, and this big stage is mostly an opportunity to learn for the future.ESPN reporters Adel Chouadria, Tyler Erzberger, Steven Nguyen and Xander Torres contributed to this story. The rankings are by ESPN.Darius Leonard Youth Jersey .com) - The Chicago Blackhawks aim for their third three-game winning streak of the season when they host the struggling Edmonton Oilers in Sundays battle at the United Center. Parris Campbell Youth Jersey .H. -- Matt Kenseth made it 2 for 2 in the Chase, holding off teammate Kyle Busch to win Sunday at New Hampshire Motor Speedway. http://www.officialindianapoliscoltspro.com/Johnny-unitas-colts-jersey/ . -- Playing time has been limited for Maxim Tissot this season, so the Montreal Impact defender made the most of his first scoring opportunity on Saturday. Peyton Manning Youth Jersey . - Blake Griffin had 30 points and 12 rebounds, J. Marvin Harrison Womens Jersey . -- Golden State Warriors coach Mark Jackson asked his players a simple question during Fridays morning shootaround: How many of them had ever been on a team 14 games over .In the first Test against Bangladesh last month, Gareth Batty took four wickets, went for fewer runs an over than Moeen Ali and Adil Rashid, and England won. For the second Test, England dropped the veteran offspinner in favour of his Surrey team-mate, the left-arm orthodox spinner Zafar Ansari, who went round the park some and got only two wickets as England lost by a fair bit. Yet it was Ansari and not Batty who lined up against India in Rajkot earlier this month.In England last summer, Batty took almost twice as many first-class wickets as Ansari. Of course, Ansari is 15 years younger with a long career ahead of him. As a left-armer, he offers variation to Moeens offspin and Rashids leggies. But could it be, though, that the England selectors always had Ansari pencilled in for the India Tests, with an eye on cricket history?England have only ever won four Test series in India. Each time, a left-arm spinner has featured prominently. Monty Panesar in 2012-13, Phil Edmonds in 1984-85, Derek Underwood in 1976-77. Douglas Jardine took two left-arm spinners to India in 1933-44, Hedley Verity and James Langridge, who took 33 of Englands 58 wickets. Never since has an England cricket team left for India without a slow left-armer in their touring party.Batty might have spun the ball more than Ansari in Rajkot, and offered Alastair Cook more control. He might even have got more wickets. But he wouldnt have been able to send down the sort of delivery with which Ansari almost got Cheteshwar Pujara in the first innings. Bowling round the wicket to the right- hander, Ansari trotted in close to the umpire and the wicket before leaping out wide in the delivery stride to create an angle and firing one in towards off stump. As it landed, the ball straightened - not enough to take it away from the batsman but enough to alter the natural angle of the delivery, which without the straightening have gone on to leg stump.Pujara, expecting a bit more turn than there was, played outside the line, was struck on the pad, and given out by umpire Chris Gaffaney. The decision was overturned using the DRS, as the ball was found to be bouncing over the stumps, but later in the innings Ansari dismissed nightwatchman Amit Mishra and Ajinkya Rahane with similar deliveries.Geoff Miller, who toured with Underwood in 1976-77 and was an England selector at the time of Panesars series in 2012-13, says that conditions in India suit left-arm spinners. It will turn out there but not always straightaway and not every ball, he says. That inconsistency makes the ball that straightens slightly particularly deadly. If the ball is not spinning, the left-arm-around angle gives the bowler a chance to beat batsmen on the inside as well as the outside.Ravindra Jadeja has taken 67 wickets at 18.73 on home pitches. He doesnt spin the ball that much or that often, but hes always an lbw threat. Pakistans Abdur Rehman caused England all sorts of problems on similar pitches, in Dubai in 2012-13. Fourteen of his 19 wickets in that series were either bowled or lbw.Former England left-arm swing bowler John Lever, who made his Test debut on the 1976-77 tour, says that when the left-armer bowls wide of the stumps, the right-hand batsman finds it more difficult to line up the delivery. The batsman has to decide, late, whether to play or leave, he says. If it doesnt turn and you leave it, theres a problem.Unlike with offspinners, the angle at which left-armers deliver the ball means that they dont actually have to bowl a doosra to cause the batsman an additional problem.The sort of ball that Ansari got his wickets with in Rajkot, the sort Jadeja bowls and Rehman bowled, starts off looking like its going to slide in with the arm. On landing, it straightens marginally or just holds its line. This presents right-hand batsmen with a confusing set of angles to deal with. Particularly a batsman who sets himself early against the balls original trajectory, towards leg stump. Or who, like Pujara against Ansari, plays outside the line, expecting it to turn away from the bat. These are the sort of deliveries that Kevin Pietersen had problems with a few years ago.Nine of Panesars 17 wickets in 2012-13, were either bowled or lbw. So were ten of Veritys and Langridges 33, but only three of Edmonds and five of Underwoods 1976-77 tally. As Ansari showed when he had R Ashwin caught at cover on the final evening in Rajkot, as England chased an unlikely victory, left-armers can get wickets with flight and traditional spin too.Even when left-arm spinners havent won series in India for England, theyve still been in the side, pressed into service for India duty. On Englands second tour to India, in 1951-52, Malcolm Hilton, a left-armer from Lancashire, played two of his four Tests and took 11 wickets. In 1963-64, England picked Yorkshires Don Wilson for the first time. A horse for the Indian course, Wilson played only one more Test, seven years later, against New Zealand.dddddddddddd Ian Blackwell went to India in 2005-06.Regulars Tony Lock, Norman Gifford, Phil Tufnell and Ashley Giles have also toured India with England.Offspinner James Tredwell, who went to India in 2012-13 as back-up to Panesar and Graeme Swann, says that left-arm spinners have another advantage over other types of slow bowlers in that they tend to bowl the ball into the pitch a bit more, with a bit more pace. Peter Such, the former England offspinner and current ECB lead spin coach, says that this is an advantage on slower pitches, like those in India. Underwood, Edmonds and Panesar could all get the ball through at a strong pace without losing the ability to spin the ball, he points out.Englands left-arm spinners in their winning series in India have been both economical and a wicket threat. In 2012-13, Panesar took 17 wickets as England came back from 1-0 down to take the next two Tests. In the final match, with England needing a draw to clinch the series, he bowled 52 overs for just 81 runs. Edmonds too was miserly in 1984-85. In the second Test, in Delhi, where England won to square the series, he sent down 88.2 overs for just 143 runs (while taking six wickets). During the series, he went, on average, at 2.11 an over. Underwood, too, kept the runs down when he wasnt taking wickets. His economy rate, 2.01, was the lowest of all England bowlers in 1976-77. Deadly would put the ball on the spot all the time, create pressure, says Lever, who bagged 26 wickets on that tour himself. Underwood hated going for runs, you could see it in his body language, in his facial expressions. He was always trying to bowl dot balls. A dot ball is a good ball, hed say. Last ball of every over had to be a dot ball.Such observes that left-armers have another way of keeping the score down - bowling over the wicket into the rough outside the right-handers leg stump. Giles did this to great effect in 2000-01, much to Sachin Tendulkars annoyance.Tredwell adds that left-armers can also cause trouble for left-hand batsmen later in the game, when rough starts appearing outside their off stump from right-arm seam bowlers following through on the pitch. There arent as many left-arm seamers, so offspinners spend more time bowling on the good part of the wicket, he says.Not that this has mattered much down the years. In 49 Test matches spread over 13 tours and 84 years, only 14 left-hand batsmen (of whom only six are recognised batsmen) have played for India against England in India.The preponderance of right-handers is borne out by figures from Indian domestic cricket. Of the top 20 all-time Ranji Trophy run-makers, only four are left-handers. Not hugely surprising, then, that ten of the top 20 bowlers are left-arm spinners. As Such says, Spinners are more effective when their stock delivery turns away from the batsman.The left-armers magic didnt work every time for England. Tufnell struggled in 1992-93, as did all the other England bowlers. Panesar and Ian Blackwell took five wickets for 383 runs between them in 2005-06, and on the next tour, Panesar averaged over 50. Even Underwood struggled on the flat, lifeless pitches that India prepared in 1981-82. Its also worth pointing out that in all four series in which they were successful, England scored heavily enough for the sort of attritional approach favoured by their left-arm spinners to reap dividends.Ansari is very much Englands third spinner. His job is to keep things steady, in shorter spells, while Moeen, Rashid, and maybe, given the right conditions, the seamers, threaten Indias batting line-up.In some ways it will be harder for Ansari to do this than it was for his more illustrious predecessors. And not just because he is only starting out on his career and is as yet unproven at Test level, but because cricket isnt such an attritional game these days and batsmen are adept at finding ways of scoring off even the most miserly bowler.The DRS might make lbws more likely but it also encourages batsmen to play with their bat rather than bat and pad. In the past, a stock ball from a left-arm-round like Ansari, angled into the pads, might have brought a tentative prod forward, the batsman unsure whether the ball will straighten or turn. These days, batsmen are more flexible, less patient.If, though, Ansari can provide England with a solid third spinning option, and along the way snaffle out one or two Indian batsmen with the sort of awkward delivery that did for Mishra and Rahane and almost got Pujara in Rajkot, then Trevor Bayliss, Cook and Co, will be happy. And the legend of the left-arm English spinner in India will live on. ' ' '